@article {14043,
	title = {O realistick{\'y}ch n{\'a}vrhoch v s{\'u}{\v c}asnej filozofii hist{\'o}rie},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {80},
	number = {1},
	year = {2025},
	pages = {20 - 34},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In recent years, several realist interpretations of historical work have been presented within the philosophy of history. In this paper, I briefly examine three of them, namely I discuss the views of T. E. F{\o}rland, B. Mitrovi{\'c} and A. Timmins. I critically analyze their claims and try to identify what unites them. I focus mainly on the concept of fact and, in general, on the building blocks of their realism. In conclusion, I show that although these are new realist accounts, which in their own way also reflect on an anti-realist interpretation of history, they can still be characterized by an effort to find solid foundations for history.},
	author = {Zele{\v n}{\'a}k, Eugen}
}
