<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lohmann, Georg</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">K metodologickým otázkam antropológie a „obrazu človeka“ s „ľudskou dôstojnosťou“</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Filozofia</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">On the Methodological Issues of Anthropology and “the Image of Man” with “Human Dignity”</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dignity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gossip</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image of God</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image of man</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Narrative about man</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">“as yet undetermined animal”</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2018/8/660-674.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">73</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">660-674</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Slovak</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The study deals with the genealogy of the meaning of anthropology. We encounter it first in Aristotle’s negative definition of anthropology as a “narrative about man” with features of a gossip. Second time we encounter it in Kant’s dual definition of anthropology. From a pragmatic point of view he perceives it as a normative narrative about people from the position of a participant and from the perspective of the primacy of the “life-world”. The third instance is its secular status of a human as the “as yet undetermined animal” (Nietzsche), who is not “just” an animal but neither is he God. The fourth instance is the status of anthropology as a practical knowledge of oneself in relation to oneself (culture) in the synthesis of knowledge of human sciences (Scheler, Gehlen, Plessner). Finally, its current self-understanding is the result of the development of the human rights agenda after 1945 with regard to “the image of man” with “human dignity.”</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">660674</style></custom3></record></records></xml>