@article {12520, title = {Kto s{\'u} Fronimoi v Plat{\'o}novom dial{\'o}gu Gorgias? (Gorg. 489e3-491d3)}, journal = {Filozofia}, volume = {73}, number = {2}, year = {2018}, pages = {97-107}, type = {State}, abstract = {In 489e3-491d3 of Plato{\textquoteright}s Gorgias one can find various derivatives of the adjective {\textquotedblleft}wise{\textquotedblright} (phronimos) in two Callicles{\textquoteright} cardinal triads. In the first triad he adds two comparatives: {\textquotedblleft}better{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}superior{\textquotedblright}. In the second triad he adds {\textquotedblleft}manly{\textquotedblright} to {\textquotedblleft}superior{\textquotedblright}. These triads represent the necessary characteristics of a true ruler, which enable him to rule appropriately as well as to fulfill the strictly hedonistic claim {\textquotedblleft}to have more{\textquotedblright}. Socrates tries to persuade Callicles that there is no direct proportion between {\textquotedblleft}to be wise{\textquotedblright} and {\textquotedblleft}having more{\textquotedblright}. Socrates uses various examples to show him that his connecting {\textquotedblleft}wise{\textquotedblright} with the principle of {\textquotedblleft}having more{\textquotedblright} could bring about the unacceptable identifying the claim of being {\textquotedblleft}wise{\textquotedblright} with techn{\'e}.}, keywords = {Callicles, Gorgias, Phronesis, Socrates}, url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2018/2/97-107.pdf}, author = {Wollner, Ulrich} }