@article {12597,
	title = {Modern{\'y} n{\'a}vrat k Aristotelovi: hylomorfn{\'e} verzus historick{\'e} esencie},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {73},
	number = {6},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {425-436},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {Anti-essentialism is a consensus in biology. Nevertheless, attempts to restore essentialism not only in philosophy of science, but also in philosophy of biology have begun to appear in the past two-three decades. In this study, we compare two neoAristotelian concepts of biological essence: the concept of historical essences (S{\'y}kora 1995) and the concept of evolutionary essences (Walsh 2006). While criticism of anti-essentialism is much the same in both approaches (typological essentialism is not Aristotelian essentialism), the two neo-Aristotelian concepts of essence differ substantially. These differences are the subject of a detailed discussion in this study.},
	keywords = {Developmental biology, Evolutionary essentialism, Historical essences},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/filozofia/2018/6/425-436.pdf},
	author = {S{\'y}kora, Peter}
}
