@article {12653,
	title = {The Fallacy of Naturalism as a Response to the Relativist},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {25},
	number = {3},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {316-338},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {This article is a response to Howard Sankey{\textquoteright}s (2010) {\textquoteleft}Witchcraft, Relativism and the Problem of the Criterion.{\textquoteright} It seeks to refute two central arguments that are brought forward by Sankey. First, that the relativist is skeptic about norm-justification and second, that naturalism could serve as a response to the relativist. I will demonstrate, by the use of historical cases, that epistemic norms cannot be subjected to empirical evaluation without using the very norms that are the target of analysis. Finally, I will reject the assertion that the conclusion of my critique implies a form of equal validity.},
	keywords = {epistemic norms, equal validity, Naturalism, objectivity, relativism},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2018/3/316-338.pdf},
	author = {B{\"a}rnthaler, Richard}
}
