@article {13716,
	title = {Religious Non-Realism as a Border Zone? Reflecting on Feuerbach{\textquoteright}s Anthropological Theology},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {78},
	number = {9},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {711 - 718},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In the present paper I examine the issue of religious non-realism with a special focus on its expression in Feuerbach{\textquoteright}s anthropological theology. First, I discuss the distinction between religious realism and non-realism exploring the recent popularization of the latter by Don Cupitt. Second, I present Feuerbach as a repre-sentative of religious non-realism and outline the critiques of his anthropological theology by Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Augusto del Noce, and Jon Stewart. Third, I analyze Martin Buber{\textquoteright}s presentation of religious non-realism as a restless position. In the conclusion I suggest that religious non-realism is a border zone between religious realism and atheism, both of which tend to be critical of it. Non-realism is subject to pressure from both sides and might be considered a weak position between two strong positions.},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2023.78.9.2},
	url = {https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/11141332filozofia.2023.78.9.2.pdf},
	author = {Peter {\v S}ajda}
}
