@article {13906,
	title = {Posthuman Feminism{\textquoteright}s Diagnostics and Horizons for International Law: Review Essay on Emily Jones{\textquoteright} Feminist Theory and International Law: Posthuman Perspectives},
	journal = {Filozofia},
	volume = {79},
	number = {6},
	year = {2024},
	pages = {665 - 676},
	type = {Recenzn{\'e} {\v s}t{\'u}die},
	abstract = {This review essay critically examines Emily Jones{\textquoteright} Feminist Theory and International Law: Posthuman Perspectives, which develops {\textquotedblleft}posthuman feminism{\textquotedblright} to diagnose the exclusionary humanism and anthropocentrism of international law. It unpacks key elements of Jones{\textquoteright} approach, her critique of international law{\textquoteright}s foundations, and her attempt to move {\textquotedblleft}beyond liberal legalism.{\textquotedblright} While tensions arise between Jones{\textquoteright} theoretical framework and reform proposals, her insistent bridging of theory and practice demonstrates posthuman feminism{\textquoteright}s potential for inspiring creative re-imaginings of legal praxis.},
	keywords = {Anthropocentrism, critical postmodern theories, Feminist philosophy, legal ontology, posthuman feminism},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.6.7},
	url = {https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/0619184310.31577filozofia.2024.79.6.7.pdf},
	author = {Jiang, Shisong}
}
