@article {1197,
	title = {Quantificational Accounts of Logical Consequence II: In the Footsteps of Bolzano},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {21},
	number = {3},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {303-326},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {Quantificational accounts of logical consequence account for it in terms of truth-preservation in all cases {\textendash} be it admissible substitutional variants or interpretations with respect to non-logical terms. In this second of my three connected studies devoted to the quantificational tradition I set out to reconstruct the seminal contributions of Russell, Carnap, Tarski and Quine and evaluate them vis-à-vis some of the most pressing objections. This study also prepares the ground for my discussion of the standard model-theoretic account of consequence to be found in the concluding study.},
	keywords = {interpretations, logical consequence, persistence, quantificational accounts, substitutions},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2014/3/303-326.pdf},
	author = {Kore{\v n}, Ladislav}
}
