@article {sip_r2006:1379,
	title = {Pravda o{\v c}ima pragmatika},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {13},
	number = {4},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {451-480},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper tries to offer an overall pragmatic perspective on the concepts {\quotedblbase}knowledge{\textquotedblleft}, {\quotedblbase}truth{\textquotedblleft}, and {\quotedblbase}reality{\textquotedblleft}. The perspective should also pick out the so-called metaphysics of {\quotedblbase}true world{\textquotedblleft} and show that the metaphysics is created by a long historical, and that{\'s} why un-necessary, tradition. This arbitrary tradition is a reason for popularity of the correspondence theory of truth, in spite of the fact that nobody can explain what {\quotedblbase}correspondence{\textquotedblleft} means exactly. The author contrasts this metaphysics with the pragmatic metaphysics of {\quotedblbase}undemarcation of organism and enviroment{\textquotedblleft}. In pragmatic terms, one truth is defined as a function of language, and hence as a function of life.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2006/4/451-480.pdf},
	author = {{\v S}{\'\i}p, Radim}
}
