@article {duzi_m2001:88,
	title = {Homonymie, <i>de dicto/de re</i> a v{\'y}znam},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {8},
	number = {3},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {235-251},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The paper completes a {\textquotedblleft}serial{\textquotedblright} of my contributions to the hot problems of current semantics, i.e. propositional / notional attitudes, de dicto / de re, synonymy, homonymy, equivalence, meaning, sense, denotation, reference. Two kinds of believing, knowing, etc. are distinguished, namely implicit believing of an ideal believer (logical / mathematical genius) and explicit believing of a logical / mathematical ignorant (idiot). A special case of a week, hidden homonymy is considered and we show that when claiming two expressions being synonymous we have to be careful, for a more fine-grained analysis may reveal that there is a semantic difference between them. The distinction between de dicto / de re supposition is defined and a special case of {\textquoteleft}existence{\textquoteright} being de dicto / de re is solved.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2001/3/235-251.pdf},
	author = {Du{\v z}{\'\i}, Marie}
}
