<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gvoždiak, Vít</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Searle’s Theory of Sign</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">John Searle’s Theory of Sign</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">arbitrariness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">de Saussure Ferdinand</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">intentionality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peirce Charles S.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">representation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Searle John</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">semiotics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sign function</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/2/148-160.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">148-160</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The article attempts to link John Searle’s philosophy and the area that is traditionally called semiotics, to bridge these domains and to demonstrate that they do relate to a shared bunch of problems. A brief discussion about the basic semiotic terms suggests that Searle’s philosophy offers an explanatory framework to key semiotic questions, namely the differentiation of non-signs and signs, the place of intentionality in semiotic description, and the nature of sign correlations. As a consequence, Searle’s theory can be called communication-oriented semiotics, which in the light of classical concepts developed by Peirce and de Saussure can be seen as a non-trivial contribution to the semiotic research.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papers</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">148160</style></custom3><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></custom5></record></records></xml>