<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Radek Ocelák</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Expressive Completeness in Brandom’s Making It Explicit</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Expressive Completeness in Brandom’s Making It Explicit</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Expressive completeness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">normative pragmatism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Robert Brandom</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">self-referentiality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">theory of meaning</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2014/3/327-337.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">21</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">327-337</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In this paper, I focus on the notion of expressive completeness in Robert Brandom’s &lt;i&gt;Making It Explicit&lt;/i&gt;. For Brandom as a normative pragmatist, a theory of meaning is expressively complete if it specifies a human practice that is sufficient to confer on expressions conceptual contents so rich that the very conferring practice can be described by means of these expressions. I put the notion of expressive completeness in contrast with the related, but non-identical notion of self-referentiality of a semantic theory. Further, I examine the position of the concept in Brandom’s philosophical project: I assess the justification Brandom provides for his claim of expressive completeness of the presented theory, and I outline the consequences he can draw for his overall project provided that expressive completeness is achieved. Whether it is actually achieved, remains however an open question.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">327337</style></custom3></record></records></xml>