<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frederick, Danny</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The  Contrast  between  Dogmatic  and  Critical  Arguments</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The  Contrast  between  Dogmatic  and  Critical  Arguments</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Critical argument</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">critical thinking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Miller</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dogmatic argument</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fallibilism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">falsification</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">inference to the best explanation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">justification</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karl Popper</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">persuasion</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">problem-solving</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2015/1/9-20.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">22</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9-20</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karl Popper lamented the prevalence of dogmatic argument in philosophy and commended the kind of critical argument that is found in the sciences. David Miller criticises the uncritical nature of so-called critical thinking because of its attachment to dogmatic arguments. I expound and clarify Popper’s distinction between critical and dogmatic arguments and the background to it. I criticise some errors in Miller’s discussion. I reaffirm the need for philosophers to eschew dogmatic arguments in favour of critical ones.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">920</style></custom3></record></records></xml>