@article {1134, title = {Nejednozna{\v c}nost v{\'y}razu p{\v r}irozen{\'e}ho jazyka p{\v r}i stejn{\'e}m v{\'y}znamu jeho slo{\v z}ek}, journal = {Organon F}, volume = {20}, number = {1}, year = {2013}, pages = {99-104}, type = {State}, abstract = {Logical analysis of natural language (LANL) based on TIL defines meaning (Frege{\textquoteright}s sense) in a procedural way, resulting in the following thesis: The meaning of an expression is independent of context. The meaning (in the case of non-indexical expressions concept) is thus an abstract procedure, which is explicated in TIL as (well-defined) construction. What does depend on context is the way in which the meaning has to be handled. From this viewpoint we can distinguish three kinds of context: (i) hyperintensional context; (ii) intensional context; (iii) extensional context.}, keywords = {construction, de dicto, de re, function, meaning, Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL)}, url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2013/1/99-104.pdf}, author = {Materna, Pavel} }