@article {1049,
	title = {Kter{\'a} formule je ta prav{\'a}? (Krit{\'e}ria adekv{\'a}tnosti logick{\'e} anal{\'y}zy)},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {19},
	number = {1},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {163-179},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {Transforming natural language sentences into formulas of a formal language (such as that of classical predicate logic) is a common practice that underlies most applications of logic to analysis of our reasoning/argumentation. Is this practice guided by any well established criteria? We argue that the answer is negative. The way from natural language to a formal one is much more tricky and much more arduous than it prima facie seems. We sketch a roadmap of this way and strive to explicate the criteria of adequacy of logical formalization that are implicit to the relevant practices. These considerations lead us to conceive logic as a project based on a search for a reflective equilibrium. Any formal system deserving the name logic must reach a balance between the authority of logical laws over individual arguments and their answerability to intuitive correctness of the bulk of such arguments.},
	keywords = {argument, logic, logical form, reflective equilibrium},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/1/163-179.pdf},
	author = {Peregrin, Jaroslav and Svoboda, Vladim{\'\i}r}
}
