@article {1073,
	title = {John Searle{\textquoteright}s Theory of Sign},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {19},
	number = {2},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {148-160},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The article attempts to link John Searle{\textquoteright}s philosophy and the area that is traditionally called semiotics, to bridge these domains and to demonstrate that they do relate to a shared bunch of problems. A brief discussion about the basic semiotic terms suggests that Searle{\textquoteright}s philosophy offers an explanatory framework to key semiotic questions, namely the differentiation of non-signs and signs, the place of intentionality in semiotic description, and the nature of sign correlations. As a consequence, Searle{\textquoteright}s theory can be called communication-oriented semiotics, which in the light of classical concepts developed by Peirce and de Saussure can be seen as a non-trivial contribution to the semiotic research.},
	keywords = {arbitrariness, de Saussure Ferdinand, intentionality, Peirce Charles S., representation, Searle John, semiotics, sign function},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/2/148-160.pdf},
	author = {Gvo{\v z}diak, V{\'\i}t}
}
