@article {1074,
	title = {How to Make the Concepts Clear: Searle{\textquoteright}s Discussion 	with Derrida},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {19},
	number = {2},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {161-169},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The first part of the paper deals with the key question of the Searle-Derrida debate, namely, with the question of conceptual {\textquotedblleft}exactness{\textquotedblright} and applicability of concepts to facts. I argue that Derrida makes a strict distinction between the exactness in the realm of concepts and the exactness in the realm of facts. Supposing that it is not correct to argue against him {\textendash} as Searle does {\textendash} that concepts cannot be exact because there are no strict boundaries between facts. The second part of the paper deals with a distinction used by John Searle: The distinction between linguistic meaning and speaker{\textquoteright}s meaning. According to Searle linguistic meaning is constituted outside a particular context of use whereas speaker{\textquoteright}s meaning is embedded in a particular situation. I argue this distinction is problematic as far as any meaning is constituted in a particular utterance and in a particular context of use.},
	keywords = {background, concept, linguistic meaning, speaker{\textquoteright}s meaning, utterance},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/2/161-169.pdf},
	author = {Kobl{\'\i}{\v z}ek, Tom{\'a}{\v s}}
}
