@article {kolman_v2004:2,
	title = {K sou{\v c}asn{\'e} anal{\'y}ze modalit},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {11},
	number = {1},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {15-31},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {In the paper I firstly review attitudes that the founders of modern logic and analytical philosophy maintained towards modalitites, preferring logical or epistemical reduction, then I proceed to their contemporary metaphysical opponents who aspire to refine the newleibnizian ontology of possible worlds. I point out some unclarified assumptions in their {\quotedblbase}arguments\'\' to which {\textendash} and to the philosophical analysis of possibility in general {\textendash} I add a few final general critical remarks based on Wittgenstein-Carnap{\'s} conception of possibility as meaningfulness.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2004/1/15-31.pdf},
	author = {Kolman, Vojt{\v e}ch}
}
