@article {1107, title = {{\quotedblbase}Co je dosa{\v z}iteln{\'e} ze {\v z}eb{\v r}{\'\i}ku, m{\v e} nezaj{\'\i}m{\'a}.{\textquotedblleft} Anal{\'y}za a kritika resolutn{\'\i} interpretace Logicko-filozofick{\'e}ho trakt{\'a}tu}, journal = {Organon F}, volume = {20}, number = {2}, year = {2013}, pages = {222-250}, type = {State}, abstract = {This paper surveys a new approach to interpretation of Wittgenstein{\textquoteright}s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus {\textendash} the resolute reading. The proponents of the resolute interpretation (especially Cora Diamond and James F. Conant) have argued that the central point of Tractatus is {\textsection} 6.54. The reading of the section should be resolute, which means the sentences in Tractatus are simply nonsense (einfach Unsinn). Thus, the Tractatus{\textquoteright} aim is not a theory or doctrine of aspects of reality, language or their relation. On the other hand, the main point of the text should be elucidation of the reader{\textquoteright}s points. The paper analyses two assumptions in the resolute reading and submits criticism of them. The basis of the criticism is to verify the validity of resolute reading{\textquoteright}s assumptions by reference to Notebooks, Prototractatus, correspondence and some manuscripts and typescripts from the Tractatus period in Wittgenstein{\textquoteright}s thinking.}, keywords = {Elucidation, interpretation, ladder metaphor, Prototractatus, resolute reading, therapy, Tractatus logico-philosophicus}, url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2013/2/222-250.pdf}, author = {Do{\v s}ek, Tom{\'a}{\v s}} }