@article {sip_r2004:340,
	title = {Wittgenstein a {\v z}ivotn{\'\i} formy},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {11},
	number = {2},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {158-173},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {The author tries to examine an opus of late Wittgenstein in some aspects: 
1) The text tries to show that common critics of a meaning {\quotedblbase}as an use{\textquotedblleft} have not met with the intentions of Wittgenstein{\textasciiacute}s work. There are two conceptions of a meaning in his Philosophical Investigations. The second conception is superior to the first one {\textendash} a meaning {\quotedblbase}as an use{\textquotedblleft} {\textendash} and the first one loses its sense if we tear it off its{\textasciiacute} social-language background. 
2) From this point of view the text tries to defend a late Wittgenstein{\textasciiacute}s method that is connected with his not traditional way of philosophizing. This way is often wrongly accounted as {\quotedblbase}a formless heaping up of ambiguouse suggetions{\textquotedblleft}. .
3) One may understand the late Wittgenstein{\textasciiacute}s philosophy as {\quotedblbase}epistemological{\textquotedblleft} critic. The author reveales a potention of this critic as he exposes confusing presuppositions of TIL. 
4) In the final part of the article author tries to introduce Wittgenstein as philosopher of a man{\textasciiacute}s liberation from structures of thinking and habits which form people apart their counsciousness.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2004/2/158-173.pdf},
	author = {{\v S}{\'\i}p, Radim}
}
