@article {palecek_m2010:2078,
	title = {Naturalizmus versus interpretativizmus ve spole{\v c}ensk{\'y}ch v{\v e}d{\'a}ch},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {17},
	number = {3},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {303-321},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {When Tooby and Cosmides published their famous article {\textquotedblleft}Psychological foundation of culture{\textquotedblright}, most readers could read it as just another paper addressing evolutionary psychology. Its aspirations were, however, much far-reaching. Tooby and Cosmides attacked the so-called constructivists. In this way, the paper ushered in another turn in the controversy over the method of social sciences. In my paper I claim that Tooby and Cosmides are right when they criticize constructivists and relativists. On the other hand, I claim that they do not live up to their aspirations, i.e. they do not provide for a rapprochement of the standards of social sciences and those of natural sciences.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2010/3/303-321.pdf},
	author = {Pale{\v c}ek, Martin}
}
