@article {fink_j2011:2355,
	title = {Are There Process-Requirements of Rationality?},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {18},
	number = {4},
	year = {2011},
	pages = {475-487},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {Does a coherentist version of rationality issue requirements on states? Or does it issue requirements on processes? This paper evaluates the possibility of process-requirements. It argues that there are two possible definitions of state- and process-requirements: a satisfaction-based definition and a content-based definition. I demonstrate that the satisfaction-based definition is inappropriate. It does not allow us to uphold a clear-cut distinction between state- and process-requirements. We should therefore use a content-based definition of state- and process-requirements. However, a content-based definition entails that rationality does not issue process-requirements. Content-based process-requirements violate the principle that {\textquoteleft}rationality requires{\textquoteright} implies {\textquoteleft}can satisfy{\textquoteright}. The conclusion of this paper therefore amounts to a radical rejection of process-requirements of rationality.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2011/4/475-487.pdf},
	author = {Fink, Julian}
}
