@article {svoboda_v2012:2494,
	title = {Pravidla, normy a analytick{\'y} filozofick{\'y} diskurz},
	journal = {Organon F},
	volume = {19},
	number = {2},
	year = {2012},
	pages = {143-179},
	type = {State},
	abstract = {This article strives to provide an original conceptual frame- work that should open a way to clarification of general philosophical debates on rules and norms . It makes a clear distinction between rules (and norms) understood as social facts grounded on specific relation- ships between social subjects and rules (norms) understood as linguistic entities. Norms are taken as specific social rules and divided into three different types: social constitutive norms, particular constitutive norms, and institutional norms . Attention is also devoted to relation between normality and normativity, to the role of permissions and to specific features of technological {\textquoteleft}rules{\textquoteright} . In the last part of the article the outlined conceptual apparatus is employed for analysis of two passages from Wittgenstein{\textquoteright}s Investigations.},
	url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2012/2/143-179.pdf},
	author = {Svoboda, Vladim{\'\i}r}
}
