<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peregrin, Jaroslav</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Svoboda, Vladimír</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Která formule je ta pravá? (Kritéria adekvátnosti logické analýzy)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Which Formula is the Right One? (Criteria of Adequacy of Logical Analysis)</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">argument</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">logic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">logical form</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reflective equilibrium</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/prilohy/2012/1/163-179.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">163-179</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Transforming natural language sentences into formulas of a formal language (such as that of classical predicate logic) is a common practice that underlies most applications of logic to analysis of our reasoning/argumentation. Is this practice guided by any well established criteria? We argue that the answer is negative. The way from natural language to a formal one is much more tricky and much more arduous than it prima facie seems. We sketch a roadmap of this way and strive to explicate the criteria of adequacy of logical formalization that are implicit to the relevant practices. These considerations lead us to conceive logic as a project based on a search for a reflective equilibrium. Any formal system deserving the name logic must reach a balance between the authority of logical laws over individual arguments and their answerability to intuitive correctness of the bulk of such arguments.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papers</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">163179</style></custom3><custom5><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></custom5></record></records></xml>