<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Došek, Tomáš</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">„Co je dosažitelné ze žebříku, mě nezajímá.“ Analýza a kritika resolutní interpretace Logicko-filozofického traktátu</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">“Anything that can be reached with a ladder does not interest me.” The Analysis and Criticism of the Resolute Reading of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elucidation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interpretation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ladder metaphor</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prototractatus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">resolute reading</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">therapy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tractatus logico-philosophicus</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2013/2/222-250.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">20</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">222-250</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Czech</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This paper surveys a new approach to interpretation of Wittgenstein’s &lt;i&gt;Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus&lt;/i&gt; – the resolute reading. The proponents of the resolute interpretation (especially Cora Diamond and James F. Conant) have argued that the central point of &lt;i&gt;Tractatus&lt;/i&gt; is § 6.54. The reading of the section should be &lt;i&gt;resolute&lt;/i&gt;, which means the sentences in Tractatus are simply nonsense (&lt;i&gt;einfach Unsinn&lt;/i&gt;). Thus, the &lt;i&gt;Tractatus’&lt;/i&gt; aim is not a theory or doctrine of aspects of reality, language or their relation. On the other hand, the main point of the text should be &lt;i&gt;elucidation&lt;/i&gt; of the reader’s points. The paper analyses two assumptions in the resolute reading and submits criticism of them. The basis of the criticism is to verify the validity of resolute reading’s assumptions by reference to &lt;i&gt;Notebooks, Prototractatus&lt;/i&gt;, correspondence and some manuscripts and typescripts from the Tractatus period in Wittgenstein’s thinking.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">222250</style></custom3></record></records></xml>