<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glavaničová, Daniela</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Δ-TIL and Normative Systems</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Δ-TIL and Normative Systems</style></translated-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Circumstances of evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">conflicts of obligations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">deontic relativism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">minimal semantics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">normative systems</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">transparent intensional logic</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2016/2/204-221.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">204-221</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">English</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">According to a widespread view, deontic modalities are relative to normative systems. Four arguments in favour of this suggestion will be presented in this paper. Nevertheless, I have proposed and defended an analysis of deontic modalities in terms of Transparent Intensional Logic (TIL) that is non-relativistic (with respect to normative systems) and accommodates minimal semantics of TIL. This leads to a question whether one can do justice to arguments for deontic relativism and put forward a &lt;em&gt;relativistic&lt;/em&gt; analysis of deontic modalities in TIL. The main aim of this paper is to amend the former analysis of deontic modalities in terms of TIL to incorporate both the standard (relativistic) view and the minimal semantics of TIL.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Articles</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">204221</style></custom3></record></records></xml>