<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Šíp, Radim</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wittgenstein a životní formy</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Organon F</style></secondary-title><translated-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wittgenstein and the Forms of Life</style></translated-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2004</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/2004/2/158-173.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">158-173</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The author tries to examine an opus of late Wittgenstein in some aspects: 
1) The text tries to show that common critics of a meaning „as an use“ have not met with the intentions of Wittgenstein´s work. There are two conceptions of a meaning in his Philosophical Investigations. The second conception is superior to the first one – a meaning „as an use“ – and the first one loses its sense if we tear it off its´ social-language background. 
2) From this point of view the text tries to defend a late Wittgenstein´s method that is connected with his not traditional way of philosophizing. This way is often wrongly accounted as „a formless heaping up of ambiguouse suggetions“. .
3) One may understand the late Wittgenstein´s philosophy as „epistemological“ critic. The author reveales a potention of this critic as he exposes confusing presuppositions of TIL. 
4) In the final part of the article author tries to introduce Wittgenstein as philosopher of a man´s liberation from structures of thinking and habits which form people apart their counsciousness.</style></abstract><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></work-type><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Papers</style></custom2><custom3><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">158173</style></custom3></record></records></xml>