@article {cernik_v1998:216, title = {Kantova kritika praktick{\'e}ho rozumu a praktick{\'e}ho usudzovania}, journal = {Organon F}, volume = {5}, number = {3}, year = {1998}, pages = {229-249}, type = {State}, abstract = {The paper is a critical analysis of Kant{\textasciiacute}s concept of practical reasoning. It is based upon an analysis of Kant{\textasciiacute}s understanding of a man as a sensual-oversensual human being. The author focuses in an analysis of lawmaking of a practical reason. He concerns in Kant{\textasciiacute}s differentiation of cathegorical and hypothetivcal imperatives, or pure (autonomic) and ordinary will, respectively. Based on this analysis he consequently reconstructs Kant{\'s} understanding of a practical reasoning. He characterizes its basic types based on a technical imperative and pragmatic advice, on cathegorical and hypothetical imperative.}, url = {http://www.klemens.sav.sk/fiusav/doc/organon/1998/3/229-249.pdf}, author = {{\v C}ern{\'\i}k, V{\'a}clav} }