Article/Publication Details

Kripkean Essentialist Argument and Its Generalization

Organon F, 2018, vol. 25, No 2, pp. 142-154.
Language: English
File to download: PDF*
BibTex EndNote Tagged EndNote XML RIS

Document Statistics:

Number of visits: 2,261
Number of visits today: 2
Last visit: 10.12.2023 - 00:23
PDF downloads: 533


In this paper I examine the argument by H. Beebee and N. Sabbarton-Leary that Brian Ellis’s scientific essentialism is based on the “abuse” of the necessary a posteriori. I will first briefly survey various attempts to resist what I will call the “Kripkean essentialist argument” to locate Beebee’s and Sabbarton-Leary’s position properly. After that I will argue that Beebee’s and Sabbarton-Leary’s argument is not successful; in particular, I will argue that under the most natural interpretation of their position it is not internally coherent, and that their argument is based on a superficial understanding of Kripkean necessity a posteriori.


analyticity, Kripkean essentialist argument, natural kind, necessity a posteriori

*The article is subject to copyright.