Department of Analytic Philosophy
Head of the Department
Researchers
PhD Students
PhD study topics for the academic year 2024/2025
Tutor: Mgr. Miloš Kosterec, PhD.
Moral responsibility – logical analysis of applicationAnnotation:Debates around moral responsibility belong among the most widespread and relevant in philosophy. The aim is to present novel arguments within the dichotomies in existing debates about moral responsibility and/or to present arguments for new ways of focusing on relevant problems. The use of analytic methods should lead to a model of arguments within a formal system. |
Transparent logicsAnnotation:In the field of hyperintensional context analysis, several transparent logics have emerged. The goal is a constructive comparison of existing solutions and a systematically grounded selection of one of these systems to address the relevant issues in the analysis of hyperintensional contexts. |
Tutor: Matteo Pascucci, PhD.
Modal logics and contextual reasoningAnnotation:In the thesis the student will focus on the philosophical and mathematical investigations into non-classical logics that can be used to analyze the syntactic and semantic behavior of modal notions in specific contexts, such as deontic reasoning, temporal reasoning, epistemic reasoning and doxastic reasoning. |
Normative reasoning and applicationsAnnotation:This research topic concerns the analysis of fundamental notions involved in everyday problems of normative reasoning, including ethical rules, moral values, deterministic vs. non-deterministic systems and theories of action. Moreover, it concerns the development of logical and computational tools for assisted reasoning in the normative domain, based on a formal representation of those notions. |
Tutor: PhDr. Daniela Vacek, PhD.
The problem(s) of control in the context of intelligent technologiesAnnotation:The control over intelligent technologies is a complex phenomenon that leads to several difficult questions, challenges, and problems: are we destined to lose the control over intelligent technologies? Who should have control, and which form of control they should have? Which form of control is morally acceptable? The thesis will provide answers to these questions. |
Intelligent technologies and responsibility gapsAnnotation:According to some researchers, intelligent technologies lead to gaps in responsibility that cannot be bridged; according to others, they lead to gaps in responsibility, but these gaps can be bridged; according to others still, they do not lead to gaps in responsibility at all. This thesis will analyze the problem of responsibility gaps and argue for one of these views. |
Tutor: Mgr. Martin Vacek, PhD.
Impossible worldsAnnotation:This PhD project investigates impossibility, specifically the relationship between the nature question — what impossibility is? — and the extent question — what impossibility there is? Impossible worlds have proven to be a useful apparatus in this regard. Following in the footsteps of their possible ancestors, impossible worlds provide a scope of applications that address the aforementioned questions. The project delves into these applications. |
Worldly and Non-Worldly HyperintensionalityAnnotation:Many philosophical problems are framed in terms of hyperintensional distinctions. Although these distinctions were initially introduced in a representational manner, various accounts treating hyperintensionality as a non-representational phenomenon have been developed. This PhD project builds on these accounts and will propose a novel worldly account of hyperintensionality. |